Click to visit OSBA's home page.
  • Ask OSBA
  • Contact us
  • Team Viewer
for help call: 1.800.578.OSBA
  • Programs

    Let us help
    • Board development
    • Charter schools and authorizers
    • Communications
    • Labor relations
    • Legislative
    • Litigation
    • PACE
    • Policy services
    • Recruitment & jobs
  • Topics

    I need to look up information
    • Ask OSBA
    • Board operations
    • Bonds
    • Budget & finance
    • Charter schools
    • Community engagement
    • Equity
    • Labor & negotiations
    • Legal
    • Legislative & advocacy
    • PERS
    • Policy
    • Public meetings & records
    • Student achievement & graduation
  • Training & Events

    Learning opportunities
    • Upcoming events
    • Previous events
    • Upcoming meetings
    • Previous meetings
    • Advocacy Opportunities
    • Training workshops
    • PACE trainings
    • Webinar archive
  • News Center

    Latest information
    • News stories
    • Legislative Highlights
    • OREdNews archive
    • Media releases
    • Social media
    • Education notes
    • Sounding Boards podcast
  • About OSBA

    Our association
    • Staff
    • Board of directors
    • Board members of color caucus
    • Legislative Policy Committee
    • Rural School Boards Advisory Committee
    • Oregon school board member of the year
    • Governance documents
    • Election center
    • Finances
    • Membership
    • Jobs at OSBA
    • RFPs and equipment
  • My OSBA

    Your account
    • Member resources
    • New portal login
  • Home
  • News Center
  • News stories
  • HB 2246

Subcommittee considers bill adding flexibility to Measure 98 law

Friday, June 30, 2017

The Joint Ways and Means Education Subcommittee laid down the rules Friday for Measure 98, the graduation rate-focused ballot measure supported by 66 percent of voters in November.

Measure 98 required the state to give districts with acceptable plans $800 per student to “expand and establish” career and technical education, college-level education opportunities and dropout prevention programs. The grants would be appropriated outside the State School Fund. Districts had to use the money for all three areas, and they could not use the money to “maintain” existing programs.

Districts, particularly smaller ones, asked for more flexibility. Small grants would not be enough to either address all three areas or to start a new program from scratch. Schools argued that “expanding” a program might not be possible if all the students who want it are already taking it but that such programs would still benefit from increased investment.

The subcommittee sent House Bill 2246-A to the full Ways and Means Committee with a “Do pass” recommendation. It would create the statutory language for Measure 98 and establish the High School Graduation and College and Career Readiness Fund for the grants. Education advocates and legislators wrangled over the language, trying to balance flexibility for how schools can use the money with the intent of voters to focus on specific strategies to improve graduation rates.

“We support the ‘what’; everyone supports the ‘what’ of Measure 98,” testified Laurie Wimmer, Oregon Education Association government relations consultant, at a hearing Thursday. “Our concern is the mechanics, the ‘how.’”

According to Wimmer, 91 percent of Oregon students are in schools that will get no flexibility under the revised Measure 98 rules.

The money for the Measure 98 fund is in the budget for the Oregon Department of Education. Senate Bill 5516 would allocate $170 million for the Measure 98 fund, about 58 percent of the estimated $294 million needed to pay $800 per qualifying student. SB 5516 is in the Ways and Means Committee.

Education subcommittee member Sen. Arnie Roblan (D-Coos Bay) pointed out during the Thursday hearing that the funding for Measure 98 nearly matched the difference between the $8.2 billion funding for K-12 education and the $8.4 billion that schools said they needed.

Measure 98 was intended as additional funding on top of the State School Fund, but districts have to devote additional staff time for grant applications and then use the money under restrictive guidelines. Many education advocates would have preferred to see that money given to schools to make local decisions about how it can best be applied.

- Jake Arnold, OSBA
jarnold@osba.org

Related content

  • Glossary of Legislative terms
  • Legislative partners
  • Schools by Senate and House district
  • Oregon legislative resources
  • Oregon government resources

Popular Content

  • Ask OSBA
  • OSBA Staff
  • Online Store
  • Contact us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Legal notice / disclaimer
  • Links
  • Sitemap
  • Subscribe

1201 Court Street NE, Suite 400, Salem, Oregon 97301
  • 1-800-578-6722
  • (503) 588-2800
  • FAX fax: (503) 588-2813