|
In a
February 2000 policy brief, the Consortium for Policy Research and
Education (CPRE) examined the motivational effects of School Based
Performance Awards (SBPA) on teachers and principals in three
sites across the country;
the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District in North Carolina, the
Kentucky Accountability Program, and the Maryland School
Performance Program. According to this study, school-based
performance awards are a popular accountability strategy intended
to align individual- or school-level monetary incentives with the
school’s ability to meet student achievement standards.
The
results of the CPRE research showed teachers working in
school-based performance awards programs knew the goals of the
program, understood them, and were committed to their achievement.
The research suggested that providing rewards for too many goals
could defuse effort and responsibility so teachers would lose
focus. Goal clarity was positively related to school performance.
The overall impact of the performance awards programs indicated
the programs motivated teachers, focused them on goals, and
organizational resources were channeled to support goal
achievement.
The
study also showed the most important motivational factor was the
teacher’s belief they could achieve their specified goals and
that their individual actions could positively influence their
student’s achievement. While teachers consistently rated
personal satisfaction for meeting the goals and for improving
student performance high, actual teacher expectations were quite
low in the programs they studied.
The
study found teachers were under increased pressure and stress,
particularly in programs with externally imposed standards and
continuous improvement components. These demands resulted in more
hours of work, which make a monetary bonus an inadequate
incentive. Furthermore, some teachers were not certain if they
achieved the goals, they would actually receive the bonus.
Teachers in schools that actually received a reward were more
likely to believe that if they met the goals, they would be
rewarded again in the future.
The
research also underscored the concept that a successful
school-based performance award must be perceived as both
substantively and procedurally fair for all involved. Substantive
fairness includes a program that adequately accounts for
differences in student populations and school resources.
Procedural fairness includes procedures to insure the rules are
known and followed by all and that teachers know what is expected
of them.
The CPRE
study concluded that the power of school-based performance awards
programs is in their ability to focus teacher efforts and channel
organizational resources to key educational goals. The
motivational power of these programs could clearly be enhanced by
better communication of goals, improving teacher expectancy,
enhancing teacher perceptions that earned rewards will be funded,
and experimentation with larger award amounts. |
|
|
|