Oregon School Boards Association Home Page
ABOUT OSBA HOT TOPICS PUBLICATIONS NEWS CENTER CALENDAR ED LINKS REGISTRATION SEARCH

Legislative and Public Affairs Board Meeting Resources Insurance Financial Services Executive Search Leadership Community Relations Policy Services Legal Services Human Resource Development

PACE: Property and Casualty Coverage for Education

OSBA Vendor Directory

You Are Here: Home > Leg > Hot Topics > Health Pool > 2/9/2007
Blue flaming torch graphic (.jpg)OSBA Legislative Services Home graphic (.jpg) Light blue round corner graphic (.gif)
Mandatory Health Insurance Pool
SB 426 does not protect against health insurance cost increases 
February 9, 2007 Issue (95k This document is in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. Click here for help.) of Legislative Highlights

Senate Bill 426 Update: The bill calling for a state-run mandatory insurance pool for school employees, which OSBA strongly opposes, is currently in the Ways and Means Committee. 

Proponents of the bill assert that it contains a "hold harmless" provision that would ensure school districts would not pay more for health insurance plans as a result of the state-run pool. In fact, this notion is an illusion - there is simply no such protection in SB 426

Here are the facts:

SB 426 does not protect school districts, ESDs and community colleges against health insurance cost increases.

SB 426 does not guarantee cost savings or even cost controls.

  • The bill's so-called "hold harmless" provision - Section 17 - does not guarantee that there will be no benefit plan premium increases for educators.
  • SB 426 does not meet the goal to reduce costs, it just duplicates coverage.
  • SB 426 provides no mechanism for a guaranteed cost savings.
  • Districts, colleges and their employees can already choose benefit plans that are both more expensive and less expensive than their current coverage. SB 426 merely reflects the current situation - it does not improve the situation, just takes choices away from locally elected officials and their local unions.
  • SB 426 does not address the real health care cost drivers: an aging employee population, prescription drug costs, high-tech procedures, and the high cost of insuring retirees.

SB 426 requires the proposed Oregon Educators Benefit Board (OEBB) to offer comparable plans only when first provided. 

  •  SB 426 contains no obligation to provide continual and ongoing benefit plans that are less costly.
  • SB 426 does not define "comparable plan," nor does it specify coverage levels for deductibles, co-pays or co-insurance for comparable plans. 
  • SB 426 contains no provision that requires the OEBB to set premiums at a less costly level for an individual district - premiums will be dictated by the claims experience of districts already in the pool.
  • If a district already has a plan at a lower cost, the district should not be forced to join OEBB.

SB 426 robs locally elected school boards of their authority to choose the most cost-effective insurance provider and plan for their districts. 

This move could cost Oregon school districts, ESDs and community colleges $99 million in the first year alone. 

To find out more, contact Tricia Yates , director of Legislative and Public Affairs, Oregon School Boards Association, 503-588-2800 or 800-578-6722.

OSBA has a financial-impact calculator that compares each district's estimated costs in the OSBA Trust and the proposed pool.

ACTION ALERT:
OSBA urges all members to call their Senators and Representatives to inform them of SB 426's impacts on their districts; legislators may be reached by calling the Capitol Switchboard, 800-332-2313. 

 

© Copyright Oregon School Boards Association
1201 Court Street NE, Suite 400, Salem, Oregon 97301
(503) 588-2800 | 1-800-578-OSBA | FAX (503) 588-2813
E-mail:
We welcome your Feedback
Help | Site Map | Map to OSBA | Legal Notice/Disclaimer | About Links
Top of this page