| Collective
Bargaining Impacts of OSBA’s Insurance Plan Redesign
Summary
of OSBA Health Insurance Trust Changes
Sample
Letter to Union for Interim Bargaining
The OSBA Health
Insurance Trust Committee's recent actions limiting the available
insurance plans options as of in October, 2003 have collective
bargaining impacts for districts with current union contracts and
district’s presently bargaining contracts.
Most union
contracts specify the carrier (Regence Blue Cross, OEA Choice,
Pacificare, etc.) as well as the coverage (i.e. plan or benefit
level). With the OSBA Trust Health Insurance Committee’s action to
eliminate some plans after October 1, 2003, union contracts that
specify plans that will be eliminated need to be reopened. Even if the
union contract does not specify the exact plan, there is still an
obligation to bargain the impact because insurance coverage is a
mandatory subject of bargaining.
This
information was created to provide general advice on how to move
forward with actions regarding labor contracts. OSBA urges districts
to consult with an attorney or labor relations consultant on any
specific changes.
Districts
with Current Union Contracts
The redesign of
the OSBA Insurance Trust plans triggers ORS 243.702 which allows for
the renegotiation of invalid provisions in collective bargaining
agreements(1). The statute(2) states that in the event an employer is
unable to perform to any words or sections of a collective bargaining
agreement then, upon request by either party, the invalid words or
sections of the collective bargaining agreement shall be reopened for
negotiation. The elimination of an insurance plan would create a true
inability of the district to meet the terms of the contract.
The
renegotiation of health insurance benefits, however, does not
constitute a complete reopening of the contract but only to the
specific words or sections of the contract that refer to the specific
benefit being eliminated. For example, a elimination of an insurance
plan would not trigger renegotiation of salary or extra duty contract
provisions. It does trigger the specific words and sections in the
insurance article, including the selection of plan, benefit levels,
and perhaps, the amount of district contribution and employee
out-of-pocket costs. The exact scope of negotiations will depend on
the actual language in your contract. If you have questions, call OSBA
for clarification.
The statute
(ORS 243.702)(2) directs the parties to use the interim bargaining
process for the renegotiation which can be completed within a 90-day
time period (ORS 243.698)(3). Remember, in order to use the interim
bargaining process, the district must give a written notice to the
union (exclusive representative). If the union does not respond
within 14 days of its receipt of that notice then the union waives its
right to demand to bargain. If the union does demand to bargain, the
90-day period starts with the receipt of the notice. If there is no
agreement within that 90-day period then the district may implement
its proposal without any further obligation to bargain.
These timelines
are important because of the effective date of the plan changes:
October 1, 2003. Working backward from the October date, the
district should send notice to the union no later than July 1, 2003.
Remember, the 90 day negotiation period starts with the receipt of the
notice by the union. The notice can be hand delivered to the
association president and/or the Uniserv Consultant. If hand delivery
is not possible, a letter with return-receipt-requested should be sent
so that there is documentation of the receipt of the notice.
Some contracts
have an article or re-opener provisions that have shorter timelines or
different notice requirements. Be sure to examine your contract to see
if there are provisions outside of the insurance article that may be
applicable.
Insurance
committees are sometimes created to make recommendations about plan
and/or carrier selection. Check your contract to determine if
committee recommendations are required before any plan change can be
made.You may need to constitute the committee in conjunction with the
90-day bargaining period.
Many contracts
include a Severability or a Separability clause or article. These
articles act similarly to ORS 243.702 cited above. Check the wording
of these clauses or article to determine your obligations. Remember, a
collective bargaining agreement cannot violate a statute. Call you
labor consultant or OSBA for advice.
Districts
Bargaining a Successor Contract
Districts that
are in the process of bargaining a successor agreement need to adjust
proposals to reflect the changes in the insurance plan redesign.
Ideally, a settlement will have to be reached on the insurance plan or
at least an interim plan pending completion of negotiations. If
bargaining continues past October 1, 2003 then the status quo
obligations for the district will come into question. Since the
insurance plans are to be discontinued, the district will not be able
to maintain the status quo until bargaining is completed.
Some Districts
may have already reached a tentative agreement on the insurance
provisions in their successor agreement. A withdrawal from a tentative
agreement can only be done with good cause. The discontinuation of an
insurance plan described in a tentative agreement would be ample
justification to meet the good cause standard set by the Employment
Relations Board.(4)
Interim
Bargaining Process Flowchart
(117k )
Footnotes
| 1 |
- The only
exception would be if there is an explicit waiver on the
part of the union to any insurance changes (I have yet to
see language like this–R.W.).
|
| 2 |
- 243.702
Renegotiation of invalid provisions in agreements.
(1) In the event any words or sections of a collective
bargaining agreement are declared to be invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, by ruling by the
Employment Relations Board, by statute or constitutional
amendment or by inability of the employer or the employees
to perform to the terms of the agreement, then upon
request by either party the invalid words or sections of
the collective bargaining agreement shall be reopened for
negotiation.
(2) Renegotiation of a collective bargaining agreement
pursuant to this section is subject to ORS 243.698.
|
| 3 |
-
ORS
243.698 Expedited bargaining process; notice;
implementation of proposed changes. (1) When the
employer is obligated to bargain over employment relations
during the term of a collective bargaining agreement and
the exclusive representative demands to bargain, the
bargaining may not, without the consent of both parties
and provided the parties have negotiated in good faith,
continue past 90 calendar days after the date the
notification specified in subsection (2) of this section
is received.
- (2) The employer
shall notify the exclusive representative in writing of
anticipated changes that impose a duty to bargain.
- (3) Within 14
calendar days after the employer’s notification of
anticipated changes specified in subsection (2) of this
section is sent, the exclusive representative may file a
demand to bargain. If a demand to bargain is not filed
within 14 days of the notice, the exclusive representative
waives its right to bargain over the change or the impact
of the change identified in the notice.
- (4) The expedited
bargaining process shall cease 90 calendar days after the
written notice described in subsection (2) of this section
is sent, and the employer may implement the proposed
changes without further obligations to bargain. At any
time during the 90-day period, the parties jointly may
agree to mediation, but that mediation shall not continue
past the 90-day period from the date the notification
specified in subsection (2) of this section is sent.
Neither party may seek binding arbitration during the
90-day period.
|
| 4 |
-
- Oregon State
Employees Association v. Bureau of Labor, Case No.
C-143-77, 3 PECBR 1911, 1916, 1922 (1978): "It is
generally held that the withdrawal of contract proposals
tentatively agreed upon at prior bargaining sessions, without
good cause, is evidence of lack of good faith
bargaining." (Emphasis in original).
|
|